This study began when, in my research for my book, I was able to demonstrate that all types of cancer can be easily linked to chemical and radiation causes, but there is one of them that was an exception. It was a cuckoo in the nest, and it was cervical cancer. This variation of cancer is now firmly established and universally due to the fact that it was caused by a virus, since many of the articles in this journal are more than testify. However, the evidence suggests otherwise, and I have no doubt that what I said is true, but before proceeding with the evidence supporting this heretical statement, let's take a look at some reference data on the disease. The key to the cause of the disease can be found in the information that now follows.
Worldwide, cervical cancer is the third most common type of cancer in women. According to the National Coalition of Cervical Cancer (NCCC), about 14,000 women in the United States are diagnosed with this disease each year, and more than 3,900 women die from this disease each year. However, the number of women receiving the disease in the Western world is very small compared to the rest of the world. Women in developing countries account for about 85% of both annual cervical cancer cases (estimated at 493,000 cases worldwide) and annual cervical cancer deaths (an estimated 273,500 deaths worldwide). In fact, while breast cancer is the leading cancer for women in the west, in most developing countries, cervical cancer remains the cause of death from cancer among women. Remember these statistics, because what they tell us is very important, as far as determining the cause of cervical cancer is concerned.
I was initially puzzled by the revelation that the virus caused cervical cancer, but then I began to wonder what exactly led the medical profession to unanimously accept this idea when all other types of cancer clearly showed that chemicals (or radiation) are responsible. When I went deep into it, I met the most mysterious riddle. You see, which doctors on the way to finding the viral cause of the disease were caused by an unclear report in a regional medical journal in Venice. It was made by an Italian surgeon and amateur epidemiologist named Rigoni-Stern in 1842. He analyzed 150,000 death certificates from the Veronese district between 1760 and 1839, and found that of the 74,184 women who died, 1,288 of them were nuns. The cause of death of the nuns has changed, but many died of breast cancer, five times more often than other women. Apparently, he correctly explained one of the reasons for the increase in breast cancer in nuns compared with other women because of the corset they wore). He recorded four deaths from uterine cancer (cervical cancer did not differ from other types of uterine cancer), while he expected at least six out of 361 cases in the remaining 72,896 women.
From this somewhat uncertain analysis, others saw the data as evidence that there was almost no cervical cancer among the Catholic nuns, compared with the rest of the Italian female population. Subsequent doctors tried to expand this obscure report by adding various invented details, including the idea that cervical cancer in prostitutes was common. So the myth arose that, since the nuns were supposed to be unmarried, but cervical cancer was rare among them, and that the disease was said to be quite common among prostitutes, this could mean only one thing. Cervical cancer was caused by sexually transmitted diseases and shortly before this assumption was accepted as a fact. Professor Skranbánek put everything in the forefront by saying this: “The reference to an obscure Italian message became a model in the first paragraphs of articles on the etiology of cervical cancer, but how many authors read the original? Skranbánek, who proved that Dr. Griffiths did at Luton Hospital, that the basis on which the theory that the sexually transmitted virus was red herring led to the fact that doctors had a false trace since then.
For a hundred years or more, they searched for a search for an elusive virus, since Smegma and Herpes were once considered the cause, but ultimately proved to be unfounded. Then came Professor Harald Zur Hausen and his team, who discovered that a number of strains of the HPV virus could be found in women who had cervical cancer. The elusive virus was discovered, and since then it has become an established scientific hypothesis. But it's not right!
If HPV does not cause cervical cancer, as I said, although most, if not all of the medical profession, would not agree with me, what do I say is the cause of the disease? To answer this question, we first need to look at the intriguing statistics that I mentioned earlier in this treatise, because it gives us vital information. "Women in developing countries account for about 85% of annual cases of cervical cancer."
Did you know that the Office of Rare Diseases (ORD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States lists cervical cancer as a “rare disease”? This means that cervical cancer or a subtype of the disease affects less than 200,000 people in the United States, a country with more than 300 million people. It is estimated that new cases and deaths from cervical cancer (womb) in the United States in 2007 by the National Cancer Institute - 11,150 new deaths with a fatal outcome of about 3,650 people. This compares with 470,000 new cases and 230,000 deaths annually for cervical cancer worldwide, most of which occur in developing countries. The good news is that cervical cancer is declining in the West, and it is believed that the introduction of Pap test is responsible. This may be partly true, but how to explain that cervical cancer was already declining before the Pap test was introduced?
The World Health Organization states that “more than 80% of the burden of this easily detectable and preventable disease lies with developing countries.” To illustrate this, WHO has published a world map that shows the projected global incidence of cervical cancer for 2005 in different countries, and this is most informative. The reason I say this is because I saw an almost exact duplicate of this card elsewhere, I admit that it has nothing to do with cervical cancer. This is a map that shows the national energy consumption of wood fuel in the world. The correlation is remarkable and obvious. OVERFLOW OF THE STATISTICAL WORLD MAP OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF CANCER AND THE CARD OF THE COUNTRIES THAT USE WOOD AS THEIR PRIMARY FUEL AND YOU WILL FIND WHY A PERFECT MATCH ... this is not accidental.
Thank you
Fred harding
Author and historian
