Increasingly, as modern life accelerates, it is tempting to believe that advances in modern medicine provide an instant solution to all our problems. Moreover, the old problems arise, for example, how to get rid of hemorrhoids. The desire for quick correction is enhanced by the awkward nature of hemorrhoids, also known as hemorrhoids or piles. Surgery immediately comes to mind, sometimes encouraged by an overly enthusiastic medical specialist.
In the face of temptation, it is often reasonable to take a step back in order to get a better perspective. Think about whether the doctor serves you? What is the percentage of hemroid patients that are recommended for surgery, and what proportion actually chooses it? What are the different surgical methods? Is it painful during and after? Will general anesthesia be applied? Will there be side effects? Is this a permanent solution? Should a second opinion be taken from another doctor? It is obvious that the answer to the question of how to get rid of hemorrhoids is not quick.
Based on the assumption that modern medicine has achieved great success, a review of what the medical community says about surgery in the area of hemorrhage can be instructive.
The Ohio State University Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery estimates that 95% of patients with hemoids can be treated WITHOUT a surgical procedure. Without commenting on external hemroids, the center continues to state that minimally invasive methods are good for treating internal hemroids, since the affected area has no painful nerve endings.
Statistical data provided by the US National Drug Library in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health confirms an estimate of 95% of Ohio. In a US study in 2004, there were 2,036,000 people suffering with bleeding who were seeking outpatient medical care in hospitals compared to 38,000 who were admitted to surgery. These are 98% who were treated, on the advice of a doctor, WITHOUT surgery. Perhaps surgery is not a clear decision, how to get rid of hemorrhoids?
The use of perspective as to whether an operation should be chosen can be gleaned from statements made by medical specialists who perform surgery based on hemosurgery.
Well-known colorectal surgeon Dr. Goh Hak-Su argues that "piling is traditionally considered one of the most painful procedures." This is due to the fact that the usual operation of piles consists in cutting piles from areas of the body that are rich in sensory nerve endings. The key risk noted by Dr. Goh is that improper removal of hemorrhoidal tissue can lead to a 20% loss of control of the anal sphincter! Imagine the chaos that awoke when we were sitting on the toilet.
Dr. Goh specializes in “painless” piling operation, known as Longo sarcoidopexy. Even with the help of this modern technology, he recognizes that, like any surgical operation, complications can arise, ranging from minor bleeding and urinary retention to major hemorrhages and rectal damage. Thus, when deciding how to get rid of hemorrhoids, keep in mind that there is no operation without risk.
How about the so-called minimally invasive surgery, which does not require hospitalization? Again, let me hear from doctors who know best. The Colorectal Health Center, which offers a one-time band system, criticizes conventional rubber tape, resulting in up to 29% of patients with hemoids who complain of pain after the procedure. The use of a metal gear clamp to help hemorrhoidal tissue is associated with pain as well as an increased risk of bleeding. Pain and prolonged post-procedure downtime (average work duration) are attributed to other minimally invasive procedures, such as infrared coagulation. The center also criticizes more invasive methods, such as stitched hemorrhoidectomy and normal hemorrhoidectomy, requiring pain and dementia for up to 14 days.
From the above, the question of how to get rid of hemorrhoids from surgery, apparently, strongly depends on which medical specialist we are talking to. Once again, there is reason for a pause, and not to rush into any surgery on hemohira.
We say that there is no need to see a doctor for hemorrhoids? NOT AT ALL. In fact, the very first thing to do when there is constant anal bleeding is to see a doctor. The main goal is to confirm that the bleeding is not caused by a more serious condition, such as colorectal or anal cancer. After hemorrhoids are diagnosed, we will be able to decide several options available for treatment. Surgery may be the solution. But more often our findings above imply otherwise.
It will be interesting to learn how 2036 000 patients deal with the problem of getting rid of hemorrhoids. Well, in the same report for 2004, it was found that retail pharmacies filled out nearly 2 million prescriptions for hemorrhoids. Most often (for example, applied on the body surface) drugs, such as pramoxin and hydrocortisone, and stool softeners, such as psyllium, were most often prescribed. The amount spent was $ 43 million.
But the most interesting comment in the report for 2004 was that the majority of people suffering from hemorrhoids do not seek medical help and are self-treated with over-the-counter medicines. These drugs, bought in retail pharmacies, were similar in nature to pramoxin and hydrocortisones. It is believed that the total cost of drugs for hemoids is huge and amounts to 43 million dollars. USA.
Indeed, there are many other possibilities how to get rid of hemorrhoids. Many of these alternatives are non-surgical and deserve attention.
