Introduction
The AMA opposes this, the American Association of Retired Persons against this, the American Association of Hospitals, the Association of American Medical Colleges, the United States Catholic Health Association and the Association of Children's Hospitals are all against it. Thus, a large number of Republican senators against him, as well as other organizations and red state citizens who supported Trump and bought his simplified election promises. Of course, the Democrats are against this, although they understand that in the long run the Puo will benefit from the storm, the Republicans will take it upon themselves if this monstrous replacement of Obamakare becomes law.
Republicans argue that this is what they promised voters when they said: “Vote for us and we will repeat the Law on Accessible Assistance.” Voters who thought it was a great idea were given a few clues as to what would happen next, except for Trump, “it will be great, awesome, better, fantastic.” Promising more care, better doctors, better service, cheaper prices and a chicken or two for the bank after each doctor’s visit, voters in the Doomsday states in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio and Iowa have given up their strength to returnees.
Republicans do not sing any hints that their replacement system will remove medical insurance for millions of Americans, offer less protection and increase spending for all but the very wealthy.
Process and result
Republicans carried out their ACT replacement bill through committees so quickly that no Republicans or even the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) could figure out what it would cost. Democrats label RyanCare legislation as “pay more for a smaller bill to ward off the Republican Party.”
The key features of this purposeful plan, which will cost much more expensive:
* Massive cuts in Medicaid services.
* The sharp increase in the cost of health insurance for everyone, especially for older Americans.
* No tax breaks for tens of millions who were subsidized from the healthcare.gov insurance market.
* Elimination of 370 billion dollars, which now go to the states for children, nursing home patients and people with disabilities.
* Penalties that insurance insurance companies, such as the requirement of “continuous coverage,” which will allow insurance companies to charge a 30 percent premium to anyone who has a break in insurance at any time.
* Weaker age protection designed to make medical care unaffordable for a large segment of the elderly.
* Elimination of all support for planned parenthood.
Costs
Estimates released by the Congress of the Joint Committee on Taxation show how much revenue the government will lose on a republican bill that the party calls the "American Health Care Law."
* Nearly $ 25 billion over 10 years as a result of the abolition of taxes on drug manufacturers.
* The abolition of taxes on insurers - almost 145 billion dollars.
* From the abolition of taxes on manufacturers of medical devices - almost $ 20 billion.
* From households with high incomes - more than 270 billion dollars. USA (from taxes on earned income and income from investments).
Why do you assume that Republicans want to remove these sources of income, which can help finance their replacement of Obamacare? Stupid - you know why! Because the Republicans do not represent the people who are arming this bill - they belong and represent big money and big business interests, which will become richer if this bill is passed into law.
resistance
The AMA, one of many groups opposed to the Republican plan, wrote to the leaders of two Congress committees expressing opposition "because of the expected reduction in health insurance coverage and the potential harm it could cause to vulnerable groups of patients."
In a letter to Congress, the Association, in which representatives fired people (E-Zine bans the acronym), stated that the bill would increase health care costs for people aged 50 to 64 years, will reduce the coverage of Medicaid long-term care and allow insurers to blame the elderly five times more than the young.
Thomas Welskotter from Think Progress summarized this pathetic exhibitor of the bill as follows: “This is not a real plan. Paul Ryan knows that this is not a real plan, so he starts working with calling his overall plan "The beginning of the conversation, not the end."
But, as already noted, if it passes, there is one soft consensus: Trump’s uprising of voters against the Republican Party for creating this tremon-compassing horror program will be a delightful satisfaction when bastards run out of the city, that is, defeated, in the mid-term elections of 2018.
Schadenfreude is a guilty pleasure and in this case is expensive, but it is a certain consensus. As Ingersoll said, “hope is a consensus in the world.”
Good luck. Look at the bright side, if you can.
