Death Hypothesis and Adjustments (Primary Version)

During the development of a pair of theories, initially the primary version of 19 parts prevailed. It was mainly about whether death is the absolute end of existence. Ultimately, through a scientific procedure (epistemological methodology), he postulated that death cannot be the end of existence if it is evaluated instrumentally.

In this version, the hypothesis had a declaration, statement and description of the relationship.

In the hypothesis declaration postulated -

"We must not accept death as an absolute goal for one." The concept of death, as the absolute end of existence, is epistemologically incorrect and is neither supported scientifically nor contrasted. but also remember that this does not lead to the absolute end of existence. The concept of death, not the absolute end of existence, is epistemologically correct and is not supported by science or opposition. context of rationality and practical utility. Therefore, we deserve a better life with this better concept. For this purpose, we must carefully use this concept for scientific and educational activities, i. E. Eliminate the phenomenon of death.

He described the stages of adjustment with death for healthy adults in the following way:

dissociation

renouncement

anger

conversation

depression

Adoption

According to this hypothesis in the twenty-first century, our attitude toward death, on average, is dissociation.

Later, a second hypothesis was developed and together they were published as hypotheses for death and adjustment, part I and II, and reviewed by the famous journal of biomedical social sciences, Death Research.

So, in short, at first there was the only hypothesis that was mainly focused on the scientific concept of death, its acceptability and its effect on healthy adults. He proposed a different concept of the phenomenon of death for scientific and educational use than the existing scientific concept. Later, subsequent studies showed that the implementation of the primary hypothesis requires the establishment of some additional changes in human terms. The second hypothesis was then developed as an additional part of the primary one. In the latest version, the primary hypothesis is updated to the first part of the hypotheses, and its additional part became part of the second.