The family doctor has traditionally been a reliable figure that parents and children could trust for sound judgment and exceed their level of family health. Most people simply assume that the education and training conducted by doctors assures them that they use the best of their judgments and that the practice of health care and medications administered to patients are the last and right advice that is undeniable. Unfortunately, this belief in a family doctor is in many ways a wrong perception. In many cases, the doctor's judgment was compromised by the overwhelming one-sided formation, which they were given by giant pharmaceutical conglomerates. The result is unnecessary use of drugs, poor results, and sometimes dangerous results for all patients to satisfy the pharmaceutical company's insatiable need to make a dollar and keep their stock price.
From the day your doctor enters medical school, his view of the world of medicine is shaped largely by pharmaceutical companies. Most large educational hospitals and university medical programs are heavily subsidized by pharmaceutical companies. Every year tens of millions of research grants and scholarships are awarded to preserve medical schools. Medical textbooks provided to students, as well as most of the literature and reading materials are provided free of charge to medical students and written or paid for by pharmaceutical companies. Not surprisingly, the first course of treatment for many diseases was to take a pharmaceutical product?
The first rule of medicine should be, as a rule, do no harm. But in many cases it is not respected. Instead of medical students learning healthy non-acoustic methods of treating common diseases, they were instead taught that drugs are the first line. treatment. This not only gives the patient unnecessary possible side effects from medications, but also causes them and their health insurance company to spend money is useless. Of course, pharmaceutical companies prefer this because there is more money for them.
Medical school courses that encourage alternative therapy, or even staple foods such as good diet and exercise, are discouraged and treat a symptom rather than a cause instead. Ethos was preceded in large part by the insidious influence of pharmaceutical companies. How did this happen? Almost every major professor in well-known medical schools receives grant money from pharmaceutical companies. If a professor or academician publishes a document that is critical to pharmaceutical practice, then they are simply revised. and missed when it came time to renew their grants. Those who catch the line are rewarded with conference trips and generous grants to explore another new drug. Then these professors publish their work in medical journals that ... you guessed it ... paid by a pharmaceutical company.
The university loves professors who publish, because it is a good PR for the university. Published articles are also one of the mandatory guidelines in many universities, where professors are determined to receive ownership and payment rights. Then there is a vicious circle where you have pharmaceutical companies using this system to promote these professors and researchers using pharmaceuticals, and those who disagree are simply discarded ... first from grants ... then from the publication .. and historically from a university. By the time a young graduate student completes his studies and begins an internship at the hospital, he was taught that for most of the diseases that he is likely to see, drugs are the first and best method of treatment. From there it gets worse. Make sure that you stop at www.sedatednation.com and see how the young doctor is even more affected by the & # 39; pharmaceutical companies when they enter private practice.
